| How Green Is Our Lobby?
By NiallO’Dowd
“HOW Green Was My Rally” was the title of an editorial in
The New York Times on Sunday about the Irish Lobby for Immigration Reform
(ILIR).
The piece was written by Lawrence Downes, who had attended the ILIR rally
for Senator Charles Schumer on the previous Friday evening in Woodlawn.
That rally was a huge success, with over 1,000 cramming into St. Barnabas
Church. Senator Schumer made plain that a new era had arrived with a Democratic
controlled House and Senate that was much more favorably inclined towards
immigration reform.
Sunday’s piece marks the second time within the past year that The
Times has focused on extensively on ILIR. In March the paper ran a front
page article about the group’s initial meetings and the huge, positive
response from the community.
It is a tribute to ILIR that they have become such a factor in the movement
to achieve immigration reform that The Times, the nation’s top newspaper,
is paying so much attention.
However, both the March article and Sunday’s editorial made much
of the fact that the Irish lobby appeared to be ignoring the other ethnic
groups fighting for immigration reform.
Such an assertion is manifestly untrue, as anyone who has attended national
rallies by immigration umbrella groups across the country over the past
year has seen. ILIR has been represented at most of them, and has had
speakers at the major rallies. ILIR is also a member of the largest umbrella
lobby group, Comprehensive Immigration Reform Now (CIRNow).
Incidentally, CIRNow is funded to the tune of millions by Atlantic Philanthropies,
whose benefactor, Charles Feeney, is a member of the advisory board of
ILIR. So much for Irish Americans not pitching in to help other ethnic
groups.
The main objection in the editorial piece appeared to be that the slogan
“Legalize the Irish” did not include other nationalities.
It might be a rather large t-shirt if ILIR had followed the advice and
included the 170 other countries or so who all need relief from the crushing
burden of current immigration law. Then the group would probably forget
Chad or some other country with illegals here, and leave itself open to
further criticism.
In the politically correct universe of The New York Times it is not good
enough for a white ethnic community to stand up and proclaim its need
to help its own by achieving immigration reform.
There preferably must always be a “Kumbya” moment when we
join hands with all the other forgotten ethnic groups and go forward together.
Such platitudes ignores the reality of immigration reform politics. Each
ethnic group has a strength that it must play to. The Latino lobby marshaled
millions of their people to take to the streets earlier this year in a
move that put immigration reform center stage.
The Irish lobby, much smaller in numbers, marshaled those politicians
in key Senate seats and congressional districts that it has had influence
over to support the overall immigration reform package bill put together
by Senators Edward Kennedy and John McCain.
That was how Senator Schumer and Senator Hillary Clinton first announced
support for the bill, and how Senator McCain could proclaim that the Irish
lobby changed the minds of several key senators on the issue.
In a strange way ILIR is a victim of its success, having been singled
out because it is able to reach in to some powerful politicians.
However, it is up to every other immigrant group to do the same, in their
own way, in the battle for immigration reform. As we face into the new
session of Congress early in the New Year, it will take a concerted effort
by all the immigrant lobbies to pass reform.
Whether that involves hand holding and feel good platitudes, or charging
hard and changing the political dynamic by playing to all our strengths
will soon be seen.
|